search for information spacer
search birth defects
search environmental factors
search geographic areas
spacer
birth defects the solution is research discoveries and data serving the public visitor type
home page
serving the public with data

history
program activities
registry
community response
the news

spacer
take our survey

Look up in our Glossary

birth defects
central nervous system (CNS)
cluster investigation
Down syndrome
heart defects
holoprosencephaly
mental retardation
neural tube defects
oral cleft
vital statistics


Downloadable
study summary
(requires Acrobat
Reader)



In 1982, Dr. John Harris and Dr. Richard Jackson in conjunction with California's legislature and governor established a groundbreaking program for birth defects monitoring and research. The California Birth Defects Monitoring Program has since become a model for surveillance in other states and a worldwide leader in birth defects research.

Our findings have guided an evolving focus over the years. Today's Program is an efficient, highly-targeted operation performing sophisticated pioneering research in birth defects causes. But such success did not come overnightit has taken 20 years to mount this effort.

1ST ERA: ESTABLISHING THE BASELINE

Granted legislative authority to confidentially access medical records in hospitals, genetics clinics and labs, the Program began monitoring in the 5 counties around the San Francisco Bay. Early accomplishments include:

bullet Data collection protocols. We set procedures for identifying children with birth defects, reviewing medical records and linking cases with Vital Statisticsnow widely used as a prototype for other US programs.
bullet Registry expansion. New counties were added to the surveillance area, with statewide coverage achieved in 1990.
bullet Baseline data. The Program published the overall frequency of birth defects-establishing for the first time California's "normal" rates.
bullet Descriptive epidemiology. Mining the data generated, scientists documented occurrence rates, patterns and trends for specific conditions.
bullet Scientific methods. Program scientists helped invent how the science is donefrom interview techniques to biologic tests for verifying exposures.

2ND ERA: GENERATING CLUES

With a data collection and analysis framework in place, the Program began to address the ultimate question posed by legislators and society: what causes birth defects? Staff established communication channels with medical/public health practitioners and the public, incorporating their concerns into research hypotheses.

bullet Outreach. Regional coordinators lectured at hospitals statewide, polling alert clinicians for their thoughts on causes.
bullet Community response. Over 100 cluster investigations and other small area studies were done to assess public concerns about birth defects and the environment.
bullet Collaboration. Liaisons with scientists and other institutions around the world provided new leads and resources to investigate complex research issues.
bullet Research results. Studies on neural tube defects, gastroschisis, cerebral palsy and other conditions provide provocative findings that call for follow-up.

3RD ERA: SHARPENING FOCUS

After casting a broad net for data and clues, we've learned from 20 years of experience which strategies work and which are less effective.

bullet Data collection procedures. The Program's huge registry databasewith information amassed on over 3.5 million birthsmakes it unnecessary to monitor all births and all conditions statewide. Instead, we gather data on a core group of conditions in a representative sample of births. Collection and analysis procedures have been enhanced to improve data quality.
bullet Research priorities. We now focus on common birth defects with substantial public health impact. Large numbers guarantee findings will be scientifically meaningful-with potential to prevent the most widespread conditions threatening today's infants. Current investigations concentrate on major heart defects, oral clefts, central nervous system defects (neural tube defects, holoprosencephaly), hypospadias, Down syndrome and other forms of mental retardation.
bullet Community response. Experience has taught us that cluster investigations will probably only uncover very potent causes of birth defectsthose increasing rates by 10 times or more. We have the capability to mobilize surveillance if such a "sledgehammer" is suspected.
bullet Upgraded scientific methods. Our studies incorporate the latest technologies, including biologic sampling and DNA analysis, to take advantage of new genetic discoveries by the Human Genome Project.

CONTINUED LEADERSHIP

With over 250 published findings, ongoing monitoring of 219,081 births/year and trailblazing research, the Program continues to be a leader in birth defects research and surveillance.





In the San Francisco Bay area in 1982, contaminated drinking water was the alleged cause of a cluster of babies born with malformed hearts. And widespread urban spraying of the pesticide malathion provoked public outrage along with fears about birth defects.

To fill this information gap, maternal and child health advocates joined with environmental activists to urge formation of a state-funded program to monitor birth defects. Early supporters of SB834, the 1982 legislation creating the Birth Defects Monitoring Program included California chapters of the March of Dimes Foundation, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Republicans and Democrats alike favored the billafter all, birth defects are a nonpartisan problem crossing racial, economic and geographic boundaries.

RELATED LINKS

bullet Enabling Legislation
bullet PDF Statutory Authority
bullet Confidentiality Procedures

 

contact information